Congressman Conyers: “What Good Is Reading The Bill?”
Print This Post
Email This Post
In a very candid moment, Congressman John Conyers (D-MI) revealed his disenchantment with actually reading such long bills for voting in Congress, when he says, “what good is reading the bill if it’s a thousand pages and you don’t have two days and two lawyers to find out what it means after you read the bill?”
I can’t tell if he’s trying to call attention to the obviously ludicrous problem that is practically a laughing matter (figuratively and literally), or if he is actually trying to provide what he thinks might be a real excuse for not reading bills up for vote! Either way, it’s a sad indicator of the Congressional state of affairs…

I previously posted about the latest rash of scandalous photos coming out of Afghanistan showing U.S. military atrocities under Obama’s command, and wondering if the media would pick up on it the way they did when it was Bush’s army… Well, here’s a twist I wasn’t expecting: yes, one of the U.S. media, Rolling Stone, [...]
Jeffrey Goldberg, a correspondent for the Atlantic, cast a spotlight on yet another disgustingly overt example of pure bias in the mainstream media, particularly at the anti-Semitic Reuters newswire. He points to a Reuters news item which contains the following despicable sentences: Police said it was a “terrorist attack” — Israel’s term for a Palestinian [...]
In the [sparse] reporting of the Palestinians’ massacre of the Fogel family, several newspapers stand out with their distorted sense of “balance”, i.e., where they feel overwhelmingly uncomfortable describing the barbarity of the Palestinians without at least taking a swipe or two at the Israelis, no matter how patently irrelevant or disgustingly disrespectful it comes [...]